Analisis Pelaksanaan Asesmen Kompetensi Madrasah Indonesia (AKMI)

Penulis

  • Lisa Dwi Susanti Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Agus Pahrudin Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Yetri Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70371/jise.v1i2.23

Kata Kunci:

Management, Analysis, Competency Assessment of Indonesian Madrasah

Abstrak

Student management cannot be separated from student evaluation activities. The Indonesian Madrasah Competency Assessment (AKMI) is the latest program owned by the Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, where AKMI is one of the evaluation tools for students. This study aims to analyze the implementation of AKMI at the State Ibtidaiyah Madrasah in Bandar Lampung City, whether all parties involved have carried out standard operating procedures (POS) for the implementation of AKMI in 2021 in accordance with applicable regulations. This research is a qualitative research with an analytical approach to find out more about how the implementation of AKMI in Kota Bandar Lampung , namely by describing the existing facts. The research was carried out by triangulation of data collection techniques, namely interviews, observations and documentation. In this study, the researcher conducted an interview with the section head and implementer of the curriculum development in the field of madrasah education of the Ministry of Religion Kota Bandar Lampung, then with the head of the madarash, proctors, technicians, teachers, and participants of the assessment test at MIN 1, MIN 9 and MIN 10 Bandar Lampung. The results of the study showed that the AKMI test can provide a clear diagnosis of the students' abilities. Meanwhile, regarding the implementation of AKMI, the duties and responsibilities carried out by the Ministry of Religion of Bandar Lampung City and the Ibtidaiyah Negeri Madrasah whose implementation is based on the POS for the implementation of the 2021 AKMI have been implemented very well. Furthermore, the preparation of the AKMI-BK system in MIN 1, MIN 9 and MIN 10 Bandar Lampung which includes the preparation of local servers, clients, LAN networks, system installations, and application installations, ensures that the use of computers is in accordance with existing regulations. The last is about the assessment results of test takers related to their abilities in the fields of reading literacy, numeracy literacy, science literacy, and socio-cultural literacy where the results obtained show that the test takers' abilities are mostly at a very low level.

Referensi

A. Rusdiana, Elis Ratna Wulan dan. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Pustaka Setia, 2014.

Adit, Albertus. “UN Tidak Dihapus tapi Sistemnya Diganti, Ini Pernyataan Nadiem Terbaru Halaman all-Kompas.com.” Diakses 20 Agustus 2021. https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2019/12/13/17485331/un-tidak-dihapus-tapi-sistemnya-diganti-ini-pernyataan-nadiem-terbaru?page=all.

Agustino, Leo. Dasar-Dasar Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: cv. Alfabeta, 2016..

Aris Kurniawan. “Pengertian Sosialisasi - Jenis, Tujuan, Tipe, Pola, Para Ahli,” 22 April 2022.https://www.guru pendidikan.co.id/pengertian-sosialisasi/.

Assesmen Kompetensi Madrasah Indonesia,” 2021. https://staksi-madrasah.kemenag.go.id/.

Admin Kota. “Pangkalan Data AKMI,” 2021.

Badrudin . Manajemen Peserta Didik, (Bahan Ajar). Jakarta: PT Indeks.2013.

Bafadal, Ibrahim. Manajemen Perlengkapan Sekolah: Teori dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Bumi aksara.2008.

Basuki, I. & Hariyanto. Asesmen Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.2014.

Daryanti & Mohammad Faris. Konsep Dasar Manajemen Pendidikan Di Sekolah. Yogyakarta : Gava Medika.2013

Hidayah, Isti, dan Sri Kadarwati. “Persepsi dan Kesiapan Guru dalam Menghadapi Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum” 4, no. 1 (2021): 6.

Husaini Usman. Manajemen: Teori Praktik Dan Riset Pendidikan. Jakarta:PT Bumi Aksara, 2008.

Imron, Ali. Manajemen Peserta Didik Berbasis Sekolah, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.2011.

Jabar, Arikunto dan. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2004.

John W. Creswell. Research Design Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran,. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2019.

Miles, Matthew B. dan Huberman, A. Michael. Analisa Data Kualitatif, (diterjemahkan oleh Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi). Jakarta: UI Press.2013

Moleong, Lexy J. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.2011.

Mulyasa. Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.2004

Nurkencana, Wayan dan Sumartana. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional, 1983.

Penmad Kota Bandar Lampung. Dokumentasi. “Profil Kemenag Kota Bandar Lampung

Poerwanti, Endang. Asesmen Pembelajaran SD. Jakarta: Depdiknas, 2008.“Konsep Dasar Asesmen Pembelajaran,” t.t., 44.

Rohim, Dhina Cahya, Septina Rahmawati, dan Inggrid Dyah Ganestri. “Konsep Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar” 33, no. 1 (2021)

Rohman, Arif. Kebijakan Pendidikan. Diktat Dosen. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta.2001.

Rusdiana, A. Manajemen Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Bandung : Pustaka Setia.2017

Saifudin Anwar. Metodelogi Penelitian,. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar. 2017.

Siti Asiah dan Ainur Rofieq. Analisis Kebijakan Ujian nasional Tingkat Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK). Jurnal Universitas Islam 45 Bekasi Edukasi , Vol. 3 No. 1 Maret 2011.

Subali, Bambang. Prinsip Asesmen dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.2012

Sudijono, Anas. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja. Grafindo Persada, 2012.

Suharsimi Arikunto. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Tindakan Pendekatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002.

Sukardi. Evaluasi Pendidikan: Prinsip dan Operasionalnya. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.2008.

Tim, Reality. Kamus Bahasa Indonesia. Surabaya: Reality Publishe, 2008.

Thoha, M. Chabib. Teknik Evaluasi Pendidikan. PT. Raja Grafindo: Jakarta 1990.

Diterbitkan

2022-06-16